Art Academy Reading Group: The Mother Archetype, Carl Jung
Following an Art Academy
discussion on fairytales and myths and symbols, we collectively decided it may
be of interest to read some writing by the twentieth century psychoanalyst Carl
Jung, and a chapter on the Mother Archetype was put forward. On reading the
text, it was apparent how embedded some of Jung’s ideas now are in popular
culture, as well as critical and cultural theory.
Art Academy member Rachel
Newsome had read a lot of writing by Jung before, and likes Jung as he was a
paradoxical thinker who was really visionary. She explained that for Jung
archetypes, of which the mother archetype is just one, are a representation of a
collective unconscious.
The mother archetype Jung describes
is all encompassing, manifested in aspects of nature as well as concepts such
as the mandala – although some of us were not familiar with the idea of the
mother as an oven! – and has both positive and negative elements. Jung’s
chapter on archetypes appears to approach the mother archetype in two parts:
first, by describing some background to the mother archetype as found in myths
and religions (Jung points out that the mother archetype is not necessarily
your mother), and second by describing the uses of archetypes in
psychoanalysis and what they can reveal about the patient, who projects them
onto the psychiatrist.
Whilst Jung uses ideas from religion and spirituality,
as a psychoanalyst he approaches the idea of the archetype in a scientific way;
Art Academy member Sara Nesturek suggested that whereas religion projects outwards, for
analysts archetypes’ value is in their ability to reveal what is inside
ourselves.
We also discussed other
archetypes, for example the trickster: today, pranksterism is often used in
social activism to make a serious point (see also the roots of carnival, when
everything is turned upside down for a day to reveal truths about the social
order). Rachel suggested that people have a bit of each archetype in them, but
certain circumstances can knock them out of balance. She is a fashion tutor,
and has used ideas about archetypes with her students. She previously taught
journalism, and showed students how the media is all about archetypes (for
example, it is easy to identify popular figures like the trickster and the
virgin whore).We discussed whether, in fact, we can manipulate archetypes, and
aspects of archetypes, to shape the way we project ourselves to others. It was
suggested that only through Jungian analysis are we made aware of projecting
these archetypes, which can be an empowering process.
We were also interested in
Jung’s reference to the anima and animus: the idea that men possess a feminine
aspect and women a masculine aspect. Rachel said that, as an author, the idea
of the animus is a useful tool for thinking both about different sides of her
characters and herself as an artist
We agreed that we would be interested in reading more writing by Jung in future, for example about dreams as well as other archetypes. It was suggested that Man and His Symbols could be a good starting point as it is accessible, and that there are some good three minute videos on Youtube by scholars of Jungian theory.